I would capital introduction punishment essay suggest that a child only in critical thinking and learning. Several studies have shown l1 vocabulary increases learners ability to identify in general tedious and somewhat similar to a specific topic, but you can talk at any Jan 01, · First of all, I would like to define the death penalty. Death penalty is when someone is put to death using different types of methods, for a serious crime such as murder, rape and drug dealing. It is also known as capital punishment, which comes from the Latin word ‘capital’ meaning ‘regarding the head’. So therefore the most common way of capital punishment is hanging or decapitating Jul 08, · According to free dictionary, Capital Punishment is to put to death as a legal punishment (Farlax). Capital Punishment is used worldwide, and is guaranteed to prevent future crime. Capital Punishment is a large controversy in the U.S. but before a personal opinion can be formed, some facts need to be known, such as what it is, where it is used and why it could be good or bad
Simple Essay: Introduction capital punishment essay certified service!
The use of death penalty has been debated by many legislators and policy-makers who find the most optimal solutions to different social problems. Various professionals attempt to determine whether capital punishment is an effective policy or a costly mistake. This is the main issue that should be discussed in this paper. Overall, it is possible to argue that this policy should be abolished because it is not an effective method of crime prevention.
This is the main thesis that should be illustrated. In particular, one can say that this policy does not deter people from committing felonies, capital punishment introduction essay, especially homicides. There is no relationship between such variables as capital punishment and the level violence in the society, capital punishment introduction essay.
Secondly, this form of punishment can pose a threat to innocent people who may be falsely convicted. Furthermore, the economic costs of this policy should not be overlooked because in many cases they are excessive. Yet, one should consider the arguments of people who support capital punishment. Much attention should be paid to the claim according to which death penalty is the only possible punishment for some crimes such as genocide or mass killings.
These are the main questions that should be discussed more closely. The supporters of death penalty argue that this policy can be viewed an effective deterrent of violent crime. To some degree, this argument is based on the premise that individuals always evaluate the positive and negative consequences of their decisions.
The validity of this argument has been examined by many scholars. For instance, one can mention the murder that can be committed in the state of emotional capital punishment introduction essay or intoxication Fagan et al. Therefore, one should not include the statistical data about such felonies when speaking about the deterrent effects of capital punishment Fagan et al. In turn, the use of this policy does not contribute capital punishment introduction essay decline of homicides that are condemned by the community.
Among these felonies, one can mention the killings of police officers or children. The main issue is that capital punishment introduction essay use of capital punishment does not deter such felonies Fagan et al. Researchers have not found any evidence suggesting that the use or abolition of death penalty can influence the level of violent crime in the community.
This is one of the details that can be identified. These examples indicate that death penalty can deter crime in a society. So, it does not serve its intended purposes. Finally, it is critical to remember the level of violent crime in a community can depend on such factors as the economic situation in the country or unemployment levels, rather than the severity of punishment. This is one of the reasons why this form of penalty should be abolished by the state.
Another limitation is the possibility of judicial error. The policy-makers should take into account that even the most impartial investigation can miss some crucial piece of evidence that can eventually exonerate a defendant. Additionally, one should not overlook the risks of biased attitude toward a person.
In this case, much attention should be paid to such a problem as racial prejudices because they can affect the attitudes of legal professionals. So, in many cases, the outcome is strongly dependent on the accuracy of investigation or impartiality of jurors. These arguments are supported by scholars who identify the shortcomings in the functioning of the criminal justice system.
For instance, one can mention the research article written by Jean Blackerby; this author argues that at least one of ten people executed for a serious felony can be falsely convicted Blackerby,p, capital punishment introduction essay.
In addition to that, DNA tests show that the results of many investigations conducted in the past were inaccurate Blackerby, Very often, people, who are placed on capital punishment introduction essay death row, are exonerated.
Yet, it is quite possible that this exoneration will come too late. This is the most crucial limitation of this policy. Moreover, one should not forget that the outcome of trials strongly depends on the competency of defense attorneys. They are able to shape the opinions of judges or jurors and identify the limitations in the arguments of prosecutors.
However, some people may not afford the services of such professionals. Therefore, it may be more difficult for them to defend their rights in the court. Therefore, it is not possible to disregard the role of capital punishment introduction essay and economic inequalities can create additional difficulties for many people, capital punishment introduction essay.
Additionally, one can say that life imprisonment can be a better solution because it reduced the risk of fatal mistakes. Apart from that, it is important to speak about the economic costs of death penalty.
To illustrate this problem, one can look at such a state as California which has to spend millions on the maintenance of death row inmates Hance et al, capital punishment introduction essay.
In contrast, the government spends a lesser amount money on people who are sentenced to life imprisonment Hance et al. This is one of the points that can be made. One should also bear in mind the executions of death penalty are often delayed. Sometimes, these people can stay on the death row for more than a decade. This policy is critical for eliminating the risk of a judicial error.
Many of the inmates can die of natural causes, but the government has to spend more money for the needs of these people Hance et al. In the long term, these practices can result in billion dollar expenditures Hance et al. Thus, life imprisonment can be a more reasonable solution that legislators need to consider. Furthermore, capital punishment trials are usually more expensive than life-without-parole cases Hance et al.
Therefore, one can say that the use of death penalty is very expensive, and these costs are not justified. Admittedly, economic considerations are not closely related to ethical and judicial questions. However, they form an important part of governmental policies. However, there capital punishment introduction essay some arguments that can be advanced in support of death penalty.
They are based on the premise that a punishment should be proportionate to the crime committed by a person Finkelstein,p. For instance, it is not possible to compare the felony committed in the state of emotional distress and the cold-blooded murder of a child.
Moreover, one can mention mass killings of people. Therefore, under some capital punishment introduction essay, capital punishment can be viewed as the only possible retribution that should be imposed on a criminal. This is one of the justifications for practicing capital punishment. Additionally, there are situations when the accusations are based on numerous testimonies, video recordings, or other materials leave virtually no room for doubt.
The advocates of death penalty can mention such people like Anders Breiwik or Timothy McVeigh who killed more than two hundred people. There are no extenuating circumstances that can be used by defense attorney.
Therefore, the advocates of capital punishment can refer to these cases in order to justify this policy. Moreover, one should not forget about such crimes as genocide or ethnic cleansings Black, The sentences that were passed during the Nuremberg Trials have not been disputed even by the opponents of capital punishment.
These are the cases capital punishment introduction essay that the validity of a death penalty cannot be fully dismissed since there are situations when this form of punishment seems the only possible response of a society to the crimes of a person, capital punishment introduction essay. Certainly, these situations can be viewed as rare exceptions but they should not be disregarded, capital punishment introduction essay. Nevertheless, these cases do not justify the use of a death penalty by the society.
It should be kept in mind that people, who perpetrate such horrible crimes, capital punishment introduction essay, may not be deterred by the possibility of capital punishment. The behavior of such individuals cannot be controlled or manipulated.
In many cases, they accept the possibility of this outcome. This is one of the details that should be considered. Therefore, one cannot refer to exceptional situations in order to justify the effectiveness of capital punishment, capital punishment introduction essay.
Such an approach can lead to the adoption of laws which may harm people. This is one of the pitfalls that should be avoided. Overall, this discussion suggests that the ethical and legal standards of capital punishment still remain a subject of heated debates. Yet, the examples presented in this paper show that the use of this penalty is not effective for the prevention of crimes such as homicide.
Moreover, one should not suppose about the costs of these policy. Finally, it is vital to remember about the possibility of a judicial error. Therefore, it is not reasonable to continue this policy. There are certain exceptional cases that can be used to justify the effectiveness of capital punishment. Yet, these exceptions are not sufficient for justifying this policy.
More likely, this strategy can victimize many innocent people. Black, P. Do circumstances ever justify capital punishment? Theological Studies, 60 2 Blackerby, J. Life after death row: Preventing wrongful capital convictions and restoring innocence after exoneration. Vanderbilt Law Review, 56 4 Fagan, J. Capital Punishment and Capital Murder: Market Share and the Deterrent Effects of capital punishment introduction essay Death Penalty. Texas Law Review 84 7 Finkelstein, C.
Death and retribution. Criminal Justice Ethics, 21 2
Is the Death Penalty Ever Moral?
, time: 5:18The Ethical and Legal Standards of Capital Punishment - Words | Essay Example
Essay About Capital Punishment. Capital punishment is a death penalty that is put into impact for significant wrongdoings. Capital punishment is an exceptionally dubious theme in the Country and all through the world. The United States has been divided by the death penalty debate, there are many supporters, however; there are also many who opposes it I would capital introduction punishment essay suggest that a child only in critical thinking and learning. Several studies have shown l1 vocabulary increases learners ability to identify in general tedious and somewhat similar to a specific topic, but you can talk at any Jan 01, · The Introduction To Death Penalty Philosophy Essay Introduction to Death penalty. The death penalty also called as Capital Punishment is one of the legal process in which Death Penalty Facts. Executions are carried out at unsteady cost to the taxpayers: It costs much more to execute a Death
No comments:
Post a Comment